Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Metropolitan District
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 11, 2012No. AC 33988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The plaintiff, Cynthia Ortiz, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her cause of action against the defendant, the Metropolitan District (district),1 for failure to comply fully with the notice provision of General Statutes § 13a-149.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court’s dismissal was improper *489because (1) her complaint also sounded in common-law negligence against the district and (2) the notice she provided to the district was sufficient to comply with § 13a-149. After thoroughly reviewing the record in this case and all relevant case law, we…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cuozzo v. Town of OrangeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Beeman v. StratfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015