Legal Opinion

State v. Beane

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2009No. 20090011, 20090015PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from a district court order granting in part Donald Be-ane’s motion to suppress evidence found during two searches that led to charges of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Because we conclude the law enforcement officers’ actions in this case did not violate Beane’s Fourth Amendment rights, we reverse the challenged part of the court’s order.

I

[¶ 2] During summer 2007, two Willi-ston parole and probation officers, Darin Cote and Lloyd Haagenson, learned that there were parole violation and aggravated assault…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. Warren J. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. GefrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. MittleiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Interest of K.B., a childNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. EmilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API