Legal Opinion

State v. Gefroh

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2011No. 20100391PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals the district court order granting Kevin James Gefroh’s motion to suppress evidence. The State argued law enforcement officers had probable cause to search for contraband, and because of the automobile exception to the warrant requirement, a warrant was not required to search Gefroh’s person. We affirm the order suppressing the evidence found on Gefroh’s person.

I

[¶ 2] The Ward County Narcotics Task Force had information suggesting Gefroh received a shipment of controlled substances and had been selling controlled substances. After receiving this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. ReisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. PogueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. KaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. LyonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API