Legal Opinion

Parks v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Lane: George F. Skipworth, Judge. Department 2. This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage for $900 and interest. A decree was rendered in favor of plaintiffs, from which defendants appeal. The defendants, by their answer, pleaded as a counterclaim that the plaintiffs misrepresented the land conveyed To defendants by plaintiffs in exchange for real property of defendants to their damage in the sum of $4,000. The reply put in issue the averments of the answer.

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

On February 15, 1916, the defendants were the owners of four lots with a frontage of one hundred feet, and two small houses in the City of San Diego, California; the plaintiffs were the owners of all of the W. % of the NW. % and the NW. of the NE. 14 and the NE. % of the NW. 14= of Sec. 24, Tp. 17 S., R. 11 W., W. M., containing 160 acres of land, more or less, in Lane County, Oregon. The plaintiffs and defendants exchanged their respective properties. Each valued their property at $6,000. There was a mortgage of $800 on the San Diego property which plaintiffs assumed. As an offset to this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Balfour v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Wimer v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ward v. JensonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Commercial National Bank v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Waymire v. ShipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. ScheiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Greig v. Interstate Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Ralston v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Miller v. FernleyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hasbrook v. LynchOregon Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API