Legal Opinion

Miller v. Fernley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1977No. 416-529, SC 24655PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit to foreclose a land sale contract involving the sale of commercial rental property. The trial court, in entering its decree, denied foreclosure to plaintiffs and denied attorney fees to all parties. Plaintiffs appeal.

The evidence reveals the following relevant facts. Mr. Hodes, fee simple title owner of the property and not a party to this suit, sold the property to the Millers, plaintiffs herein, under a land sale contract. Plaintiffs sold their interest therein to Bohlmann under a separate land sale contract (not by assignment of the Hodes-Miller contract).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Earls v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hodges Et Ux v. Servine Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Parks v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Biomass One, L.P. v. S-P ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Kunzman v. ThorsenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lemargie v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Blandau v. RennickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Ashmun v. G & H Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API