Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Greig v. Interstate Investment Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

As a rule representations as to value of real property are not actionable: Southern Oregon Orchards Co. v. Bakke, 106 Or. 20, 29 (210 Pac. 858); McCabe v. Kelleher, 90 Or. 45, 54 (175 Pac. 608); Rumbaugh v. Settlemeier, 88 Or. 105, 108 (171 Pac. 560); Society of Doukhobors v. Hecker, 83 Or. 65, 75 (162 Pac. 851). But when a representation of value is accompanied by a statement of fact which is false and known to be false by vendor, then such representation is actionable: Society of Doukhobors v. Hecker, 83 Or. 65, 75 (162 Pac. 851); Allen v. McNeelan, 79 Or. 606 (156 Pac. 274); Aitken v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. . PeckensNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ward v. JensonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Warder v. WhitishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mercer v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Buckley v. HatupinWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Dye v. Farm Mortgage Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Owens v. SchneiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Klinge v. FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API