Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Roman Jan Gorz appeals from a post-dissolution order holding him in conditional contempt of court and denying his request for modification of child support. Because the trial court’s ruling was based on its erroneous imputation of income to appellant, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
Roman Jan and Nancy Laura Gorz’s 10-year marriage was dissolved on December 7, 1987. At the time of the dissolution decree, they had two children who were six and three, respectively.
Both parties were represented by counsel in the dissolution proceedings. The decree called for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Tell v. TellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Peterson v. EishenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Beede v. LawCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eisenschenk v. EisenschenkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- County of Grant v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012