Legal Opinion

Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1996No. C1-95-2599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Roman Jan Gorz appeals from a post-dissolution order holding him in conditional contempt of court and denying his request for modification of child support. Because the trial court’s ruling was based on its erroneous imputation of income to appellant, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Roman Jan and Nancy Laura Gorz’s 10-year marriage was dissolved on December 7, 1987. At the time of the dissolution decree, they had two children who were six and three, respectively.

Both parties were represented by counsel in the dissolution proceedings. The decree called for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Tell v. TellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Peterson v. EishenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Beede v. LawCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Marriage of Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eisenschenk v. EisenschenkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. County of Grant v. KoserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API