Engines & Equipment, Inc. v. Lipscomb
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEITT, Judge.
Defendant’s exceptions and assignments of error 2, 3, 4 and 5, relating to the order entered on 11 January 1972, are not supported in his brief by reason, argument or authority, therefore, said exceptions and assignments of error are deemed abandoned. Eule 28, Eules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Furthermore, since notice of appeal was given and appeal entries made on 30 November 1971, the trial court was without authority to consider defendant’s motion filed on 6 December 1971. Wiggins v. Bunch, 280 N.C. 106, 184 S.E. 2d 879 (1971).
The sole question…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wiggins v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Johnson v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Ellison v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Capital City Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Egen v. Excalibur Resort ProfessionalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Harrington v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Texas Western Financial Corp. v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Carolina Bank, Inc. v. Northeastern Insurance Finance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.