Texas Western Financial Corp. v. Mann
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial judge erred in setting aside the default judgment because there was insufficient evidence from which the court could find excusable neglect on defendant’s part. We agree and accordingly reverse.
“Parties who have been duly served with summons are required to give their defense that attention which a man of ordinary prudence usually gives his important business, and failure to do so is not excusable.” 8 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d, Judgments § 25, p. 57; Whitaker v. Raines, 226 N.C. 526, 39 S.E. 2d 266 (1946); Johnson v. Sidbury, 225 N.C. 208, 34 S.E.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Brady v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Johnson v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Stephens Ex Rel. Houston v. ChildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Doxol Gas of Angier, Inc. v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barringer v. FORSYTH COUNTY WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY BAPTIST MEDICAL CTRCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Taylor v. Taylor Products Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Creasman v. CreasmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Grant v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Gibson v. MenaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.