Carolina Bank, Inc. v. Northeastern Insurance Finance Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
Whether excusable neglect has been shown is a question of law. The trial court considers the evidence and finds the facts. Upon the facts found, the trial judge determines, as a matter of law, whether they constitute excusable neglect. Equipment, Inc. v. Lipscomb, 15 N.C. App. 120, 189 S.E. 2d 498 (1972). Upon the facts found in this case, we think the trial judge correctly concluded that the failure of defendant John I. Lee to file an answer within the time allowed was due to excusable neglect.
Even if there is a determination of excusable neglect, our case law requires a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kirby v. ASHEVILLE CONTRACTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Gaylord v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Engines & Equipment, Inc. v. LipscombCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Estes v. . RashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Oxford Plastics v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- U.S.I.F. Wynnewood Corp. v. SoderquistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Chaparral Supply v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Briley v. FarabowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.