Legal Opinion
Chicago, S. S. & S. B. R. R. v. Fleming
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 1, 1940No. 7027PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
The Interstate Commerce Commission had determined that appellee was within the scope, and subject to, the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 151 to 164. On petition of appellee, the District Court enjoined the District Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana from instituting any proceeding against appellee for alleged violation of any provisions of that Act. From that order this appeal is prosecuted.
The statute and the principles of law here involved have been fully discussed in a number of cases involving very similar facts.1 All of these cases…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Shields v. Utah Idaho Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chester M. Himel v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Finley v. KeslingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Sprague v. WollCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Switchmen's Union of N. America v. National M. BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Chandler Laboratories, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.