Legal Opinion

Chandler Laboratories, Inc. v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 8023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

This is a suit -for a refund of taxes upon manufactured sugar in the sum of $58,-253.86, assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under Section 3490 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. §• 3490, and paid by the taxpayer, a partnership, in the year 1945. The plaintiff is a Pennsylvania corporation which is successor in interest to the partnership. The Collector moves for a summary judgment under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

In support of its motion, the Collector has filed the plaintiff’s formal admissions made under Rule 36, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Allen v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Carbon Steel Co. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Charles Peckat Mfg. Co. v. JareckiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. DaubendiekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  3. Bertha Building Corp. v. National Theatres Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1956
  4. Richard P. Vinal and United States of America v. Peterson Mortuary, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. Bravo v. Tesorero de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API