Legal Opinion

Holland v. City of Cannon Beach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-049; CA A90660PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

In this case which is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, Holland v. City of Cannon Beach, 323 Or 148, 915 P2d 407 (1996), petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming the city’s denial of his application for a subdivision. In our earlier opinion, 138 Or App 340, 908 P2d 838 (1995), we remanded the case to LUBA. We concluded that the principal issue was raised by petitioner’s argument that the city erred “by basing its [limited land use] decision on policies in its comprehensive plan rather than standards and criteria set forth in its [land use regulations].” Id. at 342.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holland v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Holland v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holland v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Paterson v. City of BendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Holland v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API