Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Holland v. City of Cannon Beach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1998No. 97-2034; CA A97846Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Plaintiff-relator (plaintiff) appeals from the trial court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his mandamus action under ORS 227.178(7). We affirm.

On March 3, 1995, the governing body of the City of Cannon Beach made a final decision denying plaintiffs application for a subdivision. Plaintiff appealed the decision to LUBA and a series of decisions by that body, this court and the Supreme Court ensued. The appellate process culminated in a remand by LUBA to the city, pursuant to our instructions in Holland v. City of Cannon Beach, 142 Or App 5, 920 P2d 562, rev den 324 Or 229 (1996). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Fraley v. Deschutes County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Smith v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Blatt v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Holland v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API