Legal Opinion

AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 29, 2018No. C.A. NO. 09–cv–30181–MAPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

PONSOR, U.S.D.J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff has filed three motions seeking various sanctions for Defendants' deliberate refusal to comply with this court's post-judgment discovery orders. Defendants' counsel does not deny that his clients have knowingly and intentionally flouted these orders. Indeed, this most recent conduct of Defendant Wolfgang Neuberger is perfectly consistent with Neuberger's pattern of unscrupulous and dishonorable conduct both as a litigant and a businessman, over many years.1

After a summary of the pertinent procedural background, the court's rulings on the motions are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  5. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AGCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API