Legal Opinion
Sotire v. City of Stamford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 29, 1989No. 6328PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiff, James J. Sotire, Sr., appeals from the judgment for the defendants rendered in his action for a writ of mandamus and for injunctive and other equitable relief. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred (1) in refusing to exercise jurisdiction over a certain individual, and (2) in holding that no procedural due process right of the plaintiff had been violated. We find no error.
The plaintiff has served as the building official and zoning enforcement officer of the city of Stamford since 1966. During 1983 and 1984, the Holiday Inn’s Crown Plaza was under construction in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stocker v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- J. M. Lynne Co. v. GeraghtySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Stapleton v. LombardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Shelton v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. WeickerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Cooke v. Bank of Boston Connecticut, No. 311655 (Sep. 17, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Greater Bridgeport Tran. v. Loc. 1336, No. Cv92 0295177 S (Jul. 24, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Sotire v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989