Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Weicker
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FREEDMAN, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiffs request for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to commence negotiations with the plaintiff pursuant to General Statutes § 47-66h (a).1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*554The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff brought this mandamus action alleging that, pursuant to General Statutes § 47-66h (a), the defendant2 is required to enter into a trust agreement with each willing indigenous Indian tribe. The plaintiff alleged that in March, 1991, it informed the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hennessey v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Sotire v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barton v. City of Waterbury, No. 0452930 S (Nov. 20, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Noreika v. Jayaraj, No. Cv 99-0152514s (Dec. 10, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999