Legal Opinion

Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Weicker

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 26, 1999No. AC 17460PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FREEDMAN, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiffs request for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to commence negotiations with the plaintiff pursuant to General Statutes § 47-66h (a).1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*554The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff brought this mandamus action alleging that, pursuant to General Statutes § 47-66h (a), the defendant2 is required to enter into a trust agreement with each willing indigenous Indian tribe. The plaintiff alleged that in March, 1991, it informed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Sotire v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barton v. City of Waterbury, No. 0452930 S (Nov. 20, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
  2. Noreika v. Jayaraj, No. Cv 99-0152514s (Dec. 10, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API