Legal Opinion

Greater Bridgeport Tran. v. Loc. 1336, No. Cv92 0295177 S (Jul. 24, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 24, 1992No. CV92 0295177 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE (NO. 103) CT Page 6991 Defendant Local Union moves to strike plaintiff's seven paragraph complaint seeking injunctive relief. Defendant claims that the motion should be granted because the complaint is legally insufficient in that:

1. the allegations do not show that contractual remedies have been exhausted;

2. the complaint admits an adequate remedy at law; and,

3. it does not allege facts showing irreparable damage.

A motion to strike is the proper vehicle with which to test…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. School Administrators Ass'n v. DowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Sotire v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API