Legal Opinion
United States v. Aguilar
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 7, 1988No. 87-3281PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns the double jeopardy implications of a prior conspiracy conviction upon a subsequent continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”) charge that is based upon the defendant’s same conduct during the same period of time. In July 1985, appellant pled guilty to conspiracy. One year later, he was indicted for, inter alia, conspiracy and engaging in a CCE. Although the two conspiracy indictments specified conduct during different time periods, the district court found that the government had arbitrarily assigned these…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Ciancaglini, A/K/A ChickieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Andres Soberon, Armando Cartaya, Franklin PenaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Carlos Eduardo Fernandez. Appeal of Carlos FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ralph Maza A/K/A Rafael MazaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Williams-DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.