Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams-Davis

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 27, 1993No. Crim. 91-0559-01, 91-0559-02, 91-0559-04, 91-0559-06 and 91-0559-20 (GHR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

The Court has before it three post-verdict motions on behalf of defendants Kevin F. Williams-Davis, Anthony T. Nugent, Alba D. Restrepo, Darryl D. Williams, and Joyce W. Boyd. These motions are, respectively, 1) a Motion to Dismiss, Or in the Alternative, For New Trial, in which all five defendants join; 2) a Motion for New Trial, And/Or Judgment of Acquittal, N.O.V., filed by defendant Joyce W. Boyd; and 3) a Motion to Dismiss, filed by defendant Darryl D. Williams. 1 Each motion pertains to what has come to be known as the first “R Street trial.”

I.…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevin Williams-DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. BertoliDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  3. State v. McKeenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. State v. HartleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  5. United States v. CamachoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API