Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Ciancaglini, A/K/A Chickie
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 13, 1988No. 88-1438PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
We are presented in this case with the issue of whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars the prosecution of appellant Joseph Ciancaglini for RICO substantive and conspiracy charges under 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1962(c), (d) (West 1984). He was earlier convicted of RICO statutory charges involving the same enterprise. One of the predicate acts underlying the present charges partially overlapped the first indictment in time. Because we find that the indictment in this appeal alleges a different pattern of racketeering activity, we will affirm the district…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gene Francis Newby and Raynaldo Barber. Gene Francis Newby (Appellant in No. 92-5711). Raynaldo Barber (Appellant in No. 92-5712)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Hiram Stanley Sasser, IICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.