Legal Opinion

United States v. Ralph Maza A/K/A Rafael Maza

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 16, 1993No. 91-3557PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals the dismissal of Count Four of its indictment against the Defendant-Appellee, Ralph Maza, charging him with a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848, the Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE) statute. Maza moved for dismissal of this count on the ground that it violated his Fifth Amendment rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause because he previously had been indicted and convicted, in the Southern District of Florida, of a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Section 846, Maza argues, is a lesser included offense of § 848; therefore, Count Four is double jeopardy…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Fornia-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Warren v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. United States v. NeblockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  4. United States v. Rafael Sanchez and Luis SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Jerry Antonio WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API