Cinema I Video, Inc. v. Thornburg
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The North Carolina General Assembly recently legislated extensive amendments to the North Carolina General Statutes pertaining to obscenity and child pornography. Many of plaintiffs’ questions presented for our review pertain to those amendments aimed at preventing child pornography and are typical of what was once described as “a new phase of the intractable obscenity problem.” Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 390 U.S. 676, 704, 20 L.Ed. 2d 225, 243, 88 S.Ct. 1298, 1313 (1968) (Harlan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Plaintiffs question virtually…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Cinema I Video, Inc. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. MayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. Sanford Video & News, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.