Legal Opinion

Heddings v. Steele

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1987No. 7 and 8 Middle District, Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

Appellants, John and Edith Steele, appeal by allowance a Superior Court order which affirmed the Court of Common *571Pleas of Lycoming County. Appellants claim that the trial judge abused his discretion by allowing hearsay testimony into evidence in a custody matter pursuant to a previously unrecognized statement against social interest exception to the hearsay rule. We agree with appellants that this proposed exception does not enjoy the requisite indicia of reliability to qualify ás a hearsay exception in this Commonwealth. We affirm the custody order of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Muller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ManivannanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Mitchell, L. v. E. Shikora, D.O., Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Glover v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API