Heddings v. Steele
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
HUTCHINSON, Justice.
Appellants, John and Edith Steele, appeal by allowance a Superior Court order which affirmed the Court of Common *571Pleas of Lycoming County. Appellants claim that the trial judge abused his discretion by allowing hearsay testimony into evidence in a custody matter pursuant to a previously unrecognized statement against social interest exception to the hearsay rule. We agree with appellants that this proposed exception does not enjoy the requisite indicia of reliability to qualify ás a hearsay exception in this Commonwealth. We affirm the custody order of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Muller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ManivannanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Mitchell, L. v. E. Shikora, D.O., Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Glover v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.