Legal Opinion

Maus v. City of Salina

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1941No. 35,115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action to recover damages under the mob statute. The city of Salina, defendant, appeals from an order overruling its demurrer to the petition. The sole question presented is whether the alleged wrongdoers constituted — under the allegations of the petition — a “mob” within the meaning of G. S. 1935, 12-201.

The section reads as follows:

“All incorporated cities and towns shall be liable for all damages that may accrue in consequence of the action of mobs within their corporate limits, whether such damage shall be the destruction of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koska v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. City of Iola v. BirnbaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Sanger v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Seigler v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Carolyn E. Jackson v. The City of Kansas City, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Hanners v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Lee v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Carter v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API