Legal Opinion

Koska v. City of Kansas

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1927No. 27,315PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for damages under the mob statute. The principal question presented, and the only one we need to discuss, is whether the petition and opening statement on behalf of plaintiff set forth facts sufficient to state a cause of action under the statute. The portion of the petition material to be considered reads as follows:

*363“That on or about the third day of June at about the hour of two o’clock a. m., plaintiff with her minor children was sleeping on the floor of her home. At about said hour, a mob consisting of four men entered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Atchison v. TwineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Adams v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Blakeman v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. City of Cherryvale v. HawmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. City of Iola v. BirnbaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. State v. DargatzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Kretchmar v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Abraham v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Maus v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API