Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Cross
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 9, 2006No. 05-72309-DTPublishedCited by 219 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT
CLELAND, District Judge.
This Court has adopted the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer issued May 5, 2006, in full and entered an Order Granting Ford’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Allen Cross and FoMoCo Obsolete (“Defendants”) on claims one, two, three, and four of Ford’s Complaint. Based upon that Order, and being advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) does have and recovers the relief prayed for in its Complaint as follows:
A. Defendants, their employees, agents,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by219 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. McGeeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Zinganything, LLC v. Import StoreDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- Chanel, Inc. v. Besumart.comDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Capitol Records v. Rita CarmichaelDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Virgin Records America, Inc. v. LaceyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.