Legal Opinion
Dynasteel Corp. v. Aztec Industries, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1992No. 90-CA-85PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
611 So.2d 977 (1992)
DYNASTEEL CORPORATION
v.
AZTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.
No. 90-CA-85.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
December 31, 1992.
Michael F. Myers, Steen Reynolds Dalehite & Currie, Jackson, for appellant.
Jeffery P. Reynolds, Heidelberg & Woodliff, Jackson, for appellee.
Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and PRATHER and BANKS, JJ.
BANKS, Justice, for the Court:
Here we consider a default judgment, without notice, for interest, attorneys' fees and punitive damages where the underlying debt was paid immediately after service of process, but no further action of record was taken by the defendant. We conclude…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Andrew Jackson Life Ins. Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Standard Life Ins. Co. of Indiana v. VealMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Tideway Oil Programs, Inc. v. SerioMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Par Industries, Inc. v. Target Container Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Allen v. Mac Tools, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Cox v. Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Friedrichs, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Hamilton v. HopkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Trout Point Lodge, Limited v. Doug HandshoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.