Dehaas v. Benesch
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
Extending some twenty miles along the south side of the Arkansas River, from which it carries a large volume of water for the irrigation of lands, lies the Besseemer Ditch. Below the ditch, seepage water emerges along the slopes and arroyos and flows in a northerly direction toward the river. Such seepage water comes to the surface in considerable quantity on lands owned by defendant Benesch and there collects in a natural depression or swale some quarter-mile in width which extends in a northerly direction through his lands and is known as the Green Arroyo. While the general slope is toward…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Platte Valley Irrigation Co. v. Buckers Irrigation, Milling & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Faden v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Nevius v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Comrie v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Holbrook Irrigation District v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Shelton Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Metropolitan Suburban Water Users Ass'n v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Cresson Consolidated Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. WhittenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.