Legal Opinion

Comrie v. Sweet

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 1924No. 10,702PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The defendants in error were petitioners in the district court for a decree adjudicating to them certain priorities *200to the right of the use of water for irrigation. A general adjudication decree in that water district had established all priorities perfected up to that time. This application is for an adjudication of water rights acquired after the date of the former decree. The plaintiffs in error appeared below as protestants and objected to any decree being awarded to the petitioners. Upon a final hearing the court made a decree awarding to the petitioners .82 of a cubic foot of water…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bieser v. StoddardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Town of Estes Park v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Shelton Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API