Leinum v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.
This is an appeal which requires interpretation of a disability insurance policy issued by defendant, Continental Casualty Company, and insuring the plaintiff, Sanford S. Leinum. The matter was tried to the court on an agreed statement of facts, which we set forth herein in full:
The plaintiff herein is a 48-year-old man who, prior to the accident and injury which is the subject of the litigation in this case, had been regularly employed as a truck driver and/or a truck driver/salesman for all of his adult working life; that the plaintiff knows no other specialized work nor has he had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thompson v. EzzellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Selective Logging Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Tucker v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- Storwick v. Reliance Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of KierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Whiteside v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. LovelessCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971