Legal Opinion

Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. Loveless

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 4, 1971No. 652-1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Super Valu Stores, plaintiff, brought this action against C. E. Loveless and John J. Nelson, defendants, seeking $70,000 balance due on a contract to sell certain store fixtures. In a trial to the court, the trial judge found a valid contract existed and found for plaintiff. Defendants appeal and contend the circumstances surrounding dealings between the two parties show no contract was intended. The trial court found two letters between the parties constituted an offer and acceptance which created a valid enforceable contract.

Defendants purchased, exclusive of fixtures, certain real property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Pepper v. EvansonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Stahl v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. National Cylinder Gas Division of Chemetron Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Mood v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Matter of Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mooney v. GR and AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  5. Carson v. Isabel Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API