Legal Opinion

Wilde v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1985No. 84-232PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Justice.

Appellant was charged with possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) with intent to deliver, in violation of § 35-7-1031(a)(ii), W.S.1977. He was convicted by a jury and sentenced to a term of not less than one and one-half nor more than two and one-half years in the state penitentiary. Appellant raises the following issues on appeal:

The trial court abused its discretion by denying defendant’s motion for a continuance.

The trial court should not have allowed testimony from the officer regarding defendant’s confession.

The trial court should have suppressed evidence obtained…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gale v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Roose v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Phillips v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Young v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API