Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1993No. 91-154PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The major issue to be resolved in this case is whether the instructions on the law of Wyoming given to the jury adequately distinguish the offenses of first degree murder and second degree murder. Michael Jay Young (Young) asserts additional, collateral issues relating to the failure of the state to preserve evidence claimed to be both exculpatory and essential to his defense, together with the constitutional implications of that failure; the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury the missing evidence could be subject to an inference or presumption it was favorable to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Thomas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API