Legal Opinion
People v. Rattenni
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
The primary issue on this appeal is whether the Grand Jury was properly instructed that any allocation of customers by the defendants was per se illegal under the Donnelly Act (General Business Law §§ 340, 341) or whether a "rule of reason” should be applied to the facts presented.
The indictment charging antitrust violations stemmed from the activities of competing waste carting firms. The evidence presented to the Grand Jury disclosed that defendant A-l Compaction, Inc. (A-l) was a waste carter which made commercial and industrial garbage collections in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- X.L.O. Concrete Corp. v. Rivergate Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Universal Studios Inc. v. Viacom Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1997
- In Re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. Saint Francis HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.