Legal Opinion

Hertz v. Mills

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 21, 1935No. 2295PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM G COLEMAN, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity brought by the plaintiff as a judgment creditor of one of the defendants, for the purpose of impressing a trust upon certain property of this defendant for the benefit of the plaintiff in order to satisfy his judgment.

Defendants filed separate motions to dismiss the bill of complaint and thereafter embodied these motions and pleas in bar in a joint and several answer, filed pursuant to Equity Rule 29 (28 USCA following section 723).

The material facts are as follows: The defendants William A. Mills and Ada \\. Mills, his wife, owned…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. Langville v. LangvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Hogue v. Sam's ClubDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
  4. Beach Mart, Inc. v. L&L Wings, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API