Legal Opinion
Hogue v. Sam's Club
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 29, 2000No. CIV.A. AW99-1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Freda Hogue, brings this Title VII action alleging that she suffered sexual harassment. The defendants are Mr. Darren Whitlock, Sam’s Club, and Wal-Mart, Inc. In its Memorandum Opinion dated September 17, 1999, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs claims of negligence and negligent hiring/retention asserted against Defendants because such claims were barred by the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act. In other orders, the Court dismissed additional claims of Plaintiff. The remaining claims advanced by Plaintiff include three state law claims of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Folan v. STATE/DCYFSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Homeland Training Center, LLC v. Summit Point Automotive Research CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Dwonzyk v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- McCusker v. Lakeview Rehab.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
- Homeland Training Center, LLC v. Summit Point Automotive Research CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010