Legal Opinion
Shutz v. Western Wholesale Liquor Distributors
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1938No. Civ. 2104PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing and terminating the proceedings for the preparation and settlement of the reporter’s transcript in connection with a prior appeal in the same action.
The plaintiff, while riding as a guest in an automobile driven by one Tarshish was injured in a collision between that car and one owned and operated by the defendants. The plaintiff brought this action for damages which was tried before a jury in March, 1935, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants. A motion for a new trial was denied and notice thereof served on the plaintiff on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Inyo Chemical Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- O'Banion v. California Canning Peach GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Kammerer v. MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hohnemann v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Walker v. EtcheverryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Cooke v. CookeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.