Legal Opinion

Walker v. Etcheverry

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1940No. Civ. 2542PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNARD, P. J.—This

is an appeal from an order terminating the proceedings for the preparation of a transcript to be used on appeal and denying a motion made by appellants for relief from default in that regard.

Judgment was entered on August 7, 1939, and a motion for a new trial was denied on September 6, 1939. On September 16, 1939, the defendants filed a notice of appeal, a notice and demand for the preparation of a transcript, a waiver of undertaking signed by the court reporter, and an order signed by the court directing the clerk to prepare a transcript. A few days later an undertaking on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Hohnemann v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. O'Banion v. California Canning Peach GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Shutz v. Western Wholesale Liquor DistributorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. EtcheverryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Williams v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Cooke v. CookeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Walker v. EtcheverryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Dr. Miles California Co. v. BronstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API