Legal Opinion

Apana v. TIG Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2009No. 08-15369, 08-15550PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CERTIFIED QUESTION TO HAWAIT SUPREME COURT

ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge.

The presentíase involves the application of a provision in the standard commercial general liability policy known as the “total pollution exclusion.” The scope of this exclusion has been described as “one of the most hotly litigated insurance coverage questions” to arise over the past three decades. See Madison Const. Co. v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 557 Pa. 595, 735 A.2d 100, 106 (Pa.1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). Indeed “[rjarely has any issue spawned as many [court decisions], and as variant in…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. TRAVCO Insurance v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  2. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Headwaters Resources, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. American National Property & Casualty Co. v. WyattMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Devcon International Corp. v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API