Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Detroit Electric Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1901PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer,J. Case by Sarab Rouse, administratrix of the estate of Henry Rouse, deceased, against the Detroit Electric Railway, for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for the death of Henry Rouse, occasioned by the claimed negligence of the defendant. It appears that Rouse, plaintiff’s intestate, a teamster, was riding with his son-in-law, one Garlick, also a teamster, in an ordinary dirt wagon, along Oakland avenue, in the city of Detroit, on the night of September 6, 1898. The men had been some eight miles out in the country, and about 8 o’clock that night, in returning, they drove along Oakland avenue. The defendant operates a double-track street railway on this avenue. Its cars in going north pass over the east…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Fritz v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Nelson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Van Brunt v. Cincinnati, Jackson & Mackinaw RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Walker v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bricker v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Bunda v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Baker v. SlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Courtney v. AppleMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. BolinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API