State Road Commission v. Utah Sugar Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice:
The only matter on appeal here is whether the company is entitled to severance damages in the estimated annual amount of about $400 which’ would be required ■for extra mileage and wages of inspectors or canal' riders, because they could no longer cross the highway, in the face of ■traffic and at right angle to the new freeway that was designed to handle a high speed and greatly increased flow of traffic going in both directions. The $400 estimated annual expense of a million dollar company, for maintenance of canal riders was reflected in testimony, and a lump sum amount of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Springville Banking Co. v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 1960
- Hampton v. State Ex Rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- Utah Road Commission v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Houghs v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Road Commission v. HooperUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Greenwood v. State ex rel. Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Road Commission v. HooperUtah Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.