Legal Opinion

Houghs v. State Highway Commissioner

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 1, 1965No. Docket 2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Giulis, P. J.

This is a mandamus action to compel the commissioner of the Michigan State highway department to remove a fence which the department erected parallel and adjacent to 1-94. A service drive parallels the fence and plaintiffs either own property abutting the service drive or a street leading into the service drive. This action was commenced in the Supreme Court, referred to the Wayne county circuit court for findings of fact on stated issues and transferred to this Court for decision. The board of county road commissioners for the county of Wayne had been added as a party defendant.

The circuit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tomazewski v. Palmer Bee Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State Highway Commissioner v. WattMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. State v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Herman v. SchafferArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Biff's Grills, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API