Legal Opinion

Rice v. Valmont Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 17, 2013No. Case No. 12-CV-602-GKF-TLWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, Chief Judge.

Before the court is the Motion for Attorney Fees [Dkt. # 16] of defendant Valmont Industries, Inc. (“Valmont”) and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge T. Lane Wilson [Dkt. # 31] on the motion. Magistrate Judge Wilson recommended that Valmont be awarded $12,586.12 in attorney fees. [Dkt. # 31 at 12]. Plaintiff, Rodney Henry Rice, Jr. (“Rice”), filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation. [Dkt. # 31].

I. Standard of Review

The district court must conduct a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 28…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. 2121 East 30th StreetCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API