Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. U.S. Department of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Since at least 2002, several competing factions have vied for leadership authority over the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe. Faced with these competing claims of authority, the Department of Interior (Department) reviewed the electoral history and recognized one of the factions for a limited time until the Tribe could hold a special election to choose new leadership. After the De partment’s decision, the Tribe conducted a special election resulting in new leadership. The Department recognized the election’s result because it concluded that the Tribe conducted the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Alvarez v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crockett v. Nea-AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Export-Import Bank of the U.SCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Franks Landing Indian Cmty. v. National Indian Gaming Comm'r.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority v. BidenDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.