Legal Opinion

Sino Century Development Ltd. v. Farley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 2012No. B236912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*691Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

In this case, we must determine whether California Rules of Court, rule 2.301 permits a trial court to award attorney fees as sanctions for a rules violation. Rule 2.30(b) authorizes the court to impose reasonable monetary sanctions for violating a rule of court. Rule 2.30(d) also provides in “addition to the sanctions awardable under (b), the court may order the person who has violated the applicable rule to pay to the party aggrieved by the violation that party’s reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, incurred in connection with the motion for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.California Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sagonowsky v. KekoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Kaufman v. Diskeeper Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. AlonzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Ferguson CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API