Legal Opinion
ES-KO, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 2, 1999No. 99-528CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action is before the court on plaintiffs request for immediate injunctive relief to enforce the automatic stay provision set out in Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) 33.103(f)(3), 48 C.F.R. § 33.103(f)(3) (1998).1 The court heard oral argument on this issue, which we consider as a request for a preliminary injunction, on July 30, 1999.
BACKGROUND
The procurement that forms the backdrop to the immediate dispute was conducted by the Defense Supply Center — Philadelphia (“DSCP”), a regional office of the Defense Supply Center, which is itself a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Ramcor Services Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Dairy Maid Dairy, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Seattle Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Hunt Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.