Semler v. General Electric Capital Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, P. J.
This appeal raises the question of whether a commercial lending institution, which is also an equity investor in a borrower’s venture, violated the Unruh Civil Rights Act (sometimes the Act) (Civ. Code, § 51) by declining to make a loan to a limited liability company because its managing member included a felon who had conspired to falsify customs documents and sell munitions to Syria.
We conclude that being a felon is not a personal characteristic similar to those enumerated in the Act; the lending institution had legitimate business reasons justifying its decision—the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Osborne v. YasmehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Correll v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Dept. of Fair Employment and Housing v. M&N Financing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Kevin B. Williams v. American Arbitration Association, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.