Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 11, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01278Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-01278-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS, 9 v. MOTION TO REMAND, AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION 10 SABER FITNESS HEGENBERGER, LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 15, 19 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Pending before the Court are Defendant Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC’s Motion to 15 Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 13), Plaintiff Micheal 16 Devin Floyd’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 15), and Floyd’s Application to Proceed In Forma 17…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.