Legal Opinion

Chadbourne & Parke, LLP v. AB Recur Finans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 2005PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered October 14, 2004, which determined that petitioner was not discharged for cause and referred the matter to a special referee to hear and report as to the reasonable value of services it rendered to respondent AB Recur Finans (ABRF), and that petitioner did not have an enforceable charging lien for its claimed contingency fee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Where the client has not established a prima facie case sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact, the question of whether the discharge of counsel was for cause…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lmwt Realty Corp. v. Davis Agency Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. GelminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Kaplan v. ReussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Kaplan v. ReussNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. ANTONMARCHI v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Galvez v. Aspen Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Maher v. Quality Bus Service, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Tunick v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Brunson v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API